Search
What you need to know before registering a company in the UAE
Company Registration
Banking Solutions in the UAE & Oman
Corporate Compliance & Reporting
Annual Corporate Maintenance Services in the UAE
Legal & Corporate Support Services
Business Acquisition & Ready-Made Companies in the UAE
Corporate Legal Services in the UAE
Business Partnerships & Joint Ventures in the UAE
Types of companies in the UAE. Types of activities
UAE Visas
Government Bodies. What Issues They Address
Types of Legal Entities
Licensing
What you need to know before registering a company in the UAE
Company Registration
Banking Solutions in the UAE & Oman
Corporate Compliance & Reporting
Annual Corporate Maintenance Services in the UAE
Legal & Corporate Support Services
Business Acquisition & Ready-Made Companies in the UAE
Corporate Legal Services in the UAE
Business Partnerships & Joint Ventures in the UAE
Types of companies in the UAE. Types of activities
UAE Visas
Government Bodies. What Issues They Address
Types of Legal Entities
Licensing
## Court Ruling
A French appeals court has convicted Air France and Airbus of involuntary manslaughter for the 2009 crash of Flight AF447, which resulted in the deaths of 228 people. This decision overturns a previous ruling that had acquitted both companies.
## Details of the Crash
The incident occurred on June 1, 2009, when the flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris crashed into the Atlantic Ocean. All 216 passengers and 12 crew members on board the Airbus A330 were killed.
## Legal Proceedings
The court ordered each company to pay a fine of 225,000 euros, the maximum penalty for corporate manslaughter. Despite the symbolic nature of the fines, the ruling is seen as a significant blow to the reputations of both companies.
## Appeals and Reactions
Both Air France and Airbus plan to appeal the decision. Air France noted that its criminal liability had been dismissed twice before, while Airbus emphasized the continuation of the legal battle. Families of the victims expressed mixed reactions, with some finding solace in the ruling and others feeling it did not bring closure.
## Technical Failures
The court found that both companies were aware of issues with the pitot tubes, which measure flight speed, but failed to adequately train pilots for such emergencies. The malfunction of these tubes during a storm led to the autopilot disengaging and the aircraft stalling.
## Pilot Actions
The court acknowledged that the pilots attempted to manage the situation to the best of their abilities, but were not sufficiently prepared for the complex failure they faced. The ruling highlighted the need for better training and communication from the companies involved.
Leave your details and get a guide as a gift to avoid mistakes
Share article