Search
What you need to know before registering a company in the UAE
Company Registration
Banking Solutions in the UAE & Oman
Corporate Compliance & Reporting
Annual Corporate Maintenance Services in the UAE
Legal & Corporate Support Services
Business Acquisition & Ready-Made Companies in the UAE
Corporate Legal Services in the UAE
Business Partnerships & Joint Ventures in the UAE
Types of companies in the UAE. Types of activities
UAE Visas
Government Bodies. What Issues They Address
Types of Legal Entities
Licensing
What you need to know before registering a company in the UAE
Company Registration
Banking Solutions in the UAE & Oman
Corporate Compliance & Reporting
Annual Corporate Maintenance Services in the UAE
Legal & Corporate Support Services
Business Acquisition & Ready-Made Companies in the UAE
Corporate Legal Services in the UAE
Business Partnerships & Joint Ventures in the UAE
Types of companies in the UAE. Types of activities
UAE Visas
Government Bodies. What Issues They Address
Types of Legal Entities
Licensing
## Court Ruling on Construction Delays
A Dubai court has ruled in favor of an investor, ordering a property developer to refund Dh185,000 due to significant construction delays. The court found that the developer's prolonged delay in completing a residential project justified a reduction in the retention penalty from 40% to 10%.
## Background of the Case
The investor had purchased three units in 2017, including one valued at approximately Dh463,000, with an expected handover by the end of 2018. However, by January 2019, construction had only reached 15.17% completion. The project was eventually finished in February 2023, well past the agreed deadline.
## Legal Proceedings
In 2023, the developer sought payment for outstanding instalments, leading to the termination of the contract under Dubai's off-plan property law. The investor, acknowledging the legality of the termination, filed a lawsuit to reduce the penalty percentage, citing the developer's breach of contract due to delays.
## Court's Decision
The court determined that retaining the full 40% would be unfair, given the developer's breach and the fact that they had regained ownership of the property. Consequently, the court ordered the developer to refund the investor, including legal interest, court expenses, and lawyer's fees.
Leave your details and get a guide as a gift to avoid mistakes
Share article